<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The best ghostly images in the world</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.paranormalmagazine.co.uk/2009/03/31/the-best-ghostly-images-in-the-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.paranormalmagazine.co.uk/2009/03/31/the-best-ghostly-images-in-the-world/</link>
	<description>Expect The Unexpected</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 10:28:32 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 150cc scooter</title>
		<link>http://www.paranormalmagazine.co.uk/2009/03/31/the-best-ghostly-images-in-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-11884</link>
		<dc:creator>150cc scooter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 18:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paranormalmagazine.co.uk/?p=1120#comment-11884</guid>
		<description>That was a nice article,I look forward to some more post from you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a nice article,I look forward to some more post from you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Walsh</title>
		<link>http://www.paranormalmagazine.co.uk/2009/03/31/the-best-ghostly-images-in-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-10544</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 21:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paranormalmagazine.co.uk/?p=1120#comment-10544</guid>
		<description>Great photographs. Paranormal photograpsh can be a pain to verify here is a great article about the use Of EXIF data to prove fakes.

http://paganoccult.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=tech&amp;action=display&amp;thread=275</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great photographs. Paranormal photograpsh can be a pain to verify here is a great article about the use Of EXIF data to prove fakes.</p>
<p><a href="http://paganoccult.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=tech&amp;action=display&amp;thread=275" rel="nofollow">http://paganoccult.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=tech&amp;action=display&amp;thread=275</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G.P.S.Arwen</title>
		<link>http://www.paranormalmagazine.co.uk/2009/03/31/the-best-ghostly-images-in-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-4686</link>
		<dc:creator>G.P.S.Arwen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 01:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paranormalmagazine.co.uk/?p=1120#comment-4686</guid>
		<description>The first picture from the scottish castle is debunked, as far as i am concerned.
Have a look for the article here:
http://badpsychics.co.uk/badghosts/modules/news/article.php?storyid=111

The pic with the man standing in the shrubs, well... it really looks as if some see-through person is standing there, but knowing how your eyes can play tricks on you, i would rather say, that it is more a combination of light and shadows in the twigs of the bushes.

On the black and white pic with the couple the blurred person behind them looks more like a double exposure to me. As far as i know double exposure is impossible with new digital cameras, but of course i don&#039;t know with which type of camera this pic was taken. 

The beach picture was debunked as well, i think As far as i remember, i read an article about that somewhere not long ago... i will see if i can find it again.

And the face in the rear view mirror is, to my opinion, a reflection of the head rest of the car seat. Again the yes are playing tricks, due to light and shadow.I&#039;ve seen pictures like that before and they were easy to debunk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first picture from the scottish castle is debunked, as far as i am concerned.<br />
Have a look for the article here:<br />
<a href="http://badpsychics.co.uk/badghosts/modules/news/article.php?storyid=111" rel="nofollow">http://badpsychics.co.uk/badghosts/modules/news/article.php?storyid=111</a></p>
<p>The pic with the man standing in the shrubs, well&#8230; it really looks as if some see-through person is standing there, but knowing how your eyes can play tricks on you, i would rather say, that it is more a combination of light and shadows in the twigs of the bushes.</p>
<p>On the black and white pic with the couple the blurred person behind them looks more like a double exposure to me. As far as i know double exposure is impossible with new digital cameras, but of course i don&#8217;t know with which type of camera this pic was taken. </p>
<p>The beach picture was debunked as well, i think As far as i remember, i read an article about that somewhere not long ago&#8230; i will see if i can find it again.</p>
<p>And the face in the rear view mirror is, to my opinion, a reflection of the head rest of the car seat. Again the yes are playing tricks, due to light and shadow.I&#8217;ve seen pictures like that before and they were easy to debunk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Many</title>
		<link>http://www.paranormalmagazine.co.uk/2009/03/31/the-best-ghostly-images-in-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-873</link>
		<dc:creator>The Many</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 07:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paranormalmagazine.co.uk/?p=1120#comment-873</guid>
		<description>The fourth picture showing the cost line...

The &quot;ghost&quot; in fact appears to be a cave cut into the rocky protrusion and its bottom half is the subsequent shadow in the water.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fourth picture showing the cost line&#8230;</p>
<p>The &#8220;ghost&#8221; in fact appears to be a cave cut into the rocky protrusion and its bottom half is the subsequent shadow in the water.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://www.paranormalmagazine.co.uk/2009/03/31/the-best-ghostly-images-in-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-856</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 21:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paranormalmagazine.co.uk/?p=1120#comment-856</guid>
		<description>I have seen many images of the castle ghost blown up,
Unfortunately it appears to be a painting or a poster
caught in that pic, definately a 2d image.

If genuine then it is an excellent photo but the larger blown up versions I have seen from Googling seem
to make it look more like a painting than a 3D figure.

These days there are so many hoaxes that it is hard to tell the genuine from the fake.
(Expert opinion these days is usually poor/wrong)

It&#039;s a shame though, I find the car mirror one more beleiveable.
But that face reminds me of certain Linda Blair &quot;Exorcist&quot; pics easily available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen many images of the castle ghost blown up,<br />
Unfortunately it appears to be a painting or a poster<br />
caught in that pic, definately a 2d image.</p>
<p>If genuine then it is an excellent photo but the larger blown up versions I have seen from Googling seem<br />
to make it look more like a painting than a 3D figure.</p>
<p>These days there are so many hoaxes that it is hard to tell the genuine from the fake.<br />
(Expert opinion these days is usually poor/wrong)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a shame though, I find the car mirror one more beleiveable.<br />
But that face reminds me of certain Linda Blair &#8220;Exorcist&#8221; pics easily available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
